Skip to main content

Excessive Function Restrictions

Excessive function restrictions in smart contracts can lead to critical issues such as funds being locked, which can prevent rightful access even in necessary situations. A well-documented example is the Akutars NFT incident, where $34 million in Ethereum was trapped due to overly restrictive contract mechanics intended for security.

For further reading on the details of the accident, you can refer to the detailed analysis

Example of a Problematic Contract​

Consider a hypothetical NFT auction contract designed to hold funds until certain conditions are met, such as all refunds being processed. The contract might include a mechanism that prevents any withdrawal until these conditions are fulfilled. Below is a simplified version of such a contract:

contract NFTAuction {
    mapping(address => uint256) public refundsDue;
    uint256 public totalRefunds;
    address admin;
    bool public refundCompleted = false;

    constructor() {
        admin = msg.sender;
    }

    // Function to allow withdrawals only after refunds are completed
    function withdrawFunds() public {
        require(msg.sender == admin, "Only admin can withdraw.");
        require(refundCompleted, "Refunds not completed.");
        payable(admin).transfer(address(this).balance);
    }

    // Function to mark refunds as completed
    function completeRefunds() public {
        require(msg.sender == admin, "Only admin can complete refunds.");
        refundCompleted = true;
    }

    // Other necessary functions like handling bids, setting up auctions, etc.
}

This example shows a strict condition that could inadvertently lock funds if the refundCompleted flag is not set due to a bug or oversight, mimicking the real-life scenario with the Akutars NFT.

Prevention Measures​

To prevent such issues while maintaining necessary security measures, consider the following strategies:

  1. Flexible Control Mechanisms: Implement multi-tier control mechanisms where more than one condition or role can influence critical operations, such as fund withdrawal.

  2. Emergency Escape Hatches: Provide fail-safe options or "escape hatches" that can be activated in exceptional circumstances to recover funds.

  3. Regular Audits and Bug Bounties: Ensure the contract is regularly audited by third-party security experts and consider running bug bounty programs to detect and resolve vulnerabilities early.

  4. Incremental Implementation: Roll out contract features incrementally with thorough testing at each stage, particularly for critical features like fund management and withdrawal permissions.